FW: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-10 Thread surabhi.ahuja
Title: RE: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on     hi, i noticed the script, and at places it says     received fast shutdown request<2006-04-10 10:25:05 IST%>LOG:  aborting any active transactions<2006-04-10 10:25:05 IST%idle>FATAL:  terminating connection due to a

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-10 Thread surabhi.ahuja
Title: RE: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on   hi, i noticed the script, and at places it says     received fast shutdown request<2006-04-10 10:25:05 IST%>LOG:  aborting any active transactions<2006-04-10 10:25:05 IST%idle>FATAL:  terminating connection due to a

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-08 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:02:04PM +0530, surabhi.ahuja wrote: > > the scenario in which the above took place was somewhat like this > we have a script to stop some of the processes running in the background. > > this script was run, and all the processes got stopped > > then another script will

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-08 Thread surabhi.ahuja
Title: RE: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on the scenario in which the above took place was somewhat like this we have a script to stop some of the processes running in the background. this script was run, and all the processes got stopped then another script will start these

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread Tom Lane
Douglas McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Could be. The actual standard use of SIGTERM is to kill processes >> belonging to your terminal process group when you log out. > I thought that was SIGHUP? Doh. Not enough caffeine absorbed yet. As penance,

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread Douglas McNaught
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martijn van Oosterhout writes: >> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:03:09PM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote: >>> What would be sending SIGTERM to a backend? > >> The only other thing I've ever heard of is some systems do a sigterm >> when you pass a quota limit? > > Co

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread Tom Lane
Martijn van Oosterhout writes: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:03:09PM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote: >> What would be sending SIGTERM to a backend? > The only other thing I've ever heard of is some systems do a sigterm > when you pass a quota limit? Could be. The actual standard use of SIGTERM is t

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:03:09PM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote: > >I'm not sure it's that--the OOM killer uses SIGKILL which would take > >down the server before it could write that log entry. > > Hmm... (tests it) you're right. What would be sending SIGTERM to a backend? The only other thing I'v

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread Richard Huxton
Douglas McNaught wrote: Richard Huxton writes: surabhi.ahuja wrote: hi, is it possible for postmaster to go doen on its own? all what the logs say is FATAL: terminating connection dur to administrator's command. Someone or something is issuing a kill command. It couldn't be the infamous Linu

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread Douglas McNaught
Richard Huxton writes: > surabhi.ahuja wrote: >> hi, is it possible for postmaster to go doen on its own? >> all what the logs say is FATAL: terminating connection dur to >> administrator's command. > > Someone or something is issuing a kill command. It couldn't be the > infamous Linux out-of-mem

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread Richard Huxton
surabhi.ahuja wrote: hi, is it possible for postmaster to go doen on its own? all what the logs say is FATAL: terminating connection dur to administrator's command. Someone or something is issuing a kill command. It couldn't be the infamous Linux out-of-memory handler, could it? Check your sy

Re: [GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread James Cradock
It's not normal. What's the installation? OS, applications connecting to the server, etc. On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:20 AM, surabhi.ahuja wrote:hi, is it possible for postmaster to go doen on its own?   all what the logs say is FATAL: terminating connection dur to administrator's command.   thanks, regar

[GENERAL] postmaster going down own its on

2006-04-07 Thread surabhi.ahuja
hi, is it possible for postmaster to go doen on its own?   all what the logs say is FATAL: terminating connection dur to administrator's command.   thanks, regards Surabhi