Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Also, 7.0.1, propagating now to an archive near you, contains some
> fudge-factor twiddling to make it more willing to choose an indexscan.
> We shall soon find out whether that made things better or worse for
> typical uses...
>
> regards, tom lane
O
"Simon Hardingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have run explain on the query and it shows that it is just
> performed a sequential scan on version 7.0
> Seq Scan on gazet (cost.)
> On the old version (6.5.1) it reports
> Index Scan using gazet_index on gazet (cost=
> Any suggesti
