"Dave Page" writes:
>> There's also a licensing issue which is that pgAdmin is GPL, while
>> we're trying to make sure that all contrib modules are licensed
>> the same as the core server.
> Yeuch, not GPL - Artistic.
Oh, my mistake, I looked at the phppgadmin home page not pgadmin's.
But relice
> There's also a licensing issue which is that pgAdmin is GPL,
> while we're trying to make sure that all contrib modules are
> licensed the same as the core server.
No, pgAdmin is Artistic License, not GPL.
Still not BSD, tough, so the argument still holds even if the difference
isn't as big.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 March 2006 22:02
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tony Caduto; Devrim GUNDUZ; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] question about the admin contrib
> module and binary
>
> &q
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 15:52 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> All I am trying to say is that it should be included in this file:
> postgresql-contrib-8.1.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm
> so binary linux users can use it almost as easy as the binary win32
> users.
It won't happen, because adminpack is not in con
"Dave Page" writes:
> Yeah - wxWidgets, GTK etc. but none are required by the admin module,
> only by pgAdmin itself on the users workstation.
Oh, so what we're talking about is some server-side support functions
for the pgAdmin client? OK, that's not what I was envisioning. From
a dependency s
Dave Page wrote:
Well in fairness to Tony we do refer to it as a 'contrib' module, but
that's because it uses the contrib build system (or PGXS in SVN trunk).
Devrim has said he will
build it as a separate RPM - in the meantime a source tarball can be
downloaded from http://www.pgadmin.org/d
Which is one very good reason why it should be a separate RPM, no? If
it were in the contrib RPM then you could not install that RPM *at all*
on a machine that didn't have all of pgadmin's dependencies. I don't
know offhand what its dependencies are, but I'd imagine they include a
fair number
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 22 March 2006 21:31
> To: Tony Caduto
> Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] question about the admin contrib
> modu
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I understand it was created by the pgAdmin project, but don't you think
> it would be better to be with the rest of the contrib modules?
Except it isn't one of the contrib modules. The fact that you think of
it as being like them doesn't make it one of t
As far as I can tell there is no admin813 contrib module... I am
looking at my 8.1.3 source install and there is no contrib module
named that???
If the pgAdmin folks would like to submit it to PostgreSQL contrib
that is a different argument.
Joshua D. Drake
Hi Joshua,
You are correct,
Tony Caduto wrote:
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Admin81 stuff is not a part of PostgreSQL RPMs -- it is a part of
pgadmin3 project.
gards,
Hi,
I understand it was created by the pgAdmin project, but don't you think
it would be better to be with the rest of the contrib modules? I and
many others
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Admin81 stuff is not a part of PostgreSQL RPMs -- it is a part of
pgadmin3 project.
gards,
Hi,
I understand it was created by the pgAdmin project, but don't you think
it would be better to be with the rest of the contrib modules? I and
many others don't want to insta
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 13:31 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> I just updated my CentOS box to Postgresql 8.1.3 and installed the
> contrib rpm and I can't find the admin81 stuff anywhere.
> My question is how come this is not included in the RPM based binary
> distrubution?
Admin81 stuff is not a
Hi,
I just updated my CentOS box to Postgresql 8.1.3 and installed the
contrib rpm and I can't find the admin81 stuff anywhere.
My question is how come this is not included in the RPM based binary
distrubution?
I don't have a source based install of PG anywhere nor do the servers
have the compi
14 matches
Mail list logo
