[GENERAL] shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4

2003-10-24 Thread John DeSoi
I get this when I try to start up a freshly compiled beta4 on OS X 10.2.6: FATAL: could not create shared memory segment: Invalid argument I saw a previous thread on this for beta2. It sounded like this was a bug that was to be fixed in beta3, but I'm still having this problem with beta4. Th

Re: [GENERAL] shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4

2003-10-25 Thread John DeSoi
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 10:19 AM, Adam Witney wrote: I don't know what this error is particularly, but just to say that 7.4beta5 compiles and starts up fine on my OSX 10.2.8 machine OK, I compiled beta 5 and put my rest SHMMAX back to the default settings as provided by OS X. Still the s

Re: [GENERAL] shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4

2003-10-28 Thread Jim Crate
>> And here are are the default settings for OS X 10.2.6: >> >> sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=4194304 > >Well, I can only say that if I lower shmmax to that value, initdb picks >max_connections = 50 >shared_buffers = 300 I just did a fresh install of 7.4b5 on a fresh install of MacOS 10.3, and i

Re: [GENERAL] shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4

2003-10-28 Thread Eric Soroos
Slightly off topic confirmations... And here are are the default settings for OS X 10.2.6: sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=4194304 Seems to be the default on 10.2.8 as well. 10.1.5 doesn't seem to have a kern.sysv.* section: [broccoli:~] erics% sysctl kern.sysv.shmmax second level name sysv in k

Re: [GENERAL] shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4

2003-10-29 Thread Tom Lane
John DeSoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What version of OS X are you running? I thought I replicated the > problem after upgrading to 10.2.8, but now I'm not certain I ran initdb > again (I may have just rebuilt beta 5). So possibly it could be a > difference between 10.2.6 and 10.2.8. If not,