On 16/10/2009 20:38, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
Does PG = PostgreSQL? If so, it can do LDAP, Kerberos and PAM, among
other things:
Apologies for the noise - I thought I was replying to a non-PG list. :-)
Ray.
--
Raymond O'Donnell,
Hey everyone,
I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never
setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is,
what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG
authentication? From what I've read the main choices are NIS or LDAP.
LDAP
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Scot Kreienkamp skre...@la-z-boy.comwrote:
Hey everyone,
I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never setup
a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is, what do
most people do for centralized command line, X,
: Scott Mead [mailto:scott.li...@enterprisedb.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 2:50 PM
To: Scot Kreienkamp
Cc: pgsql-general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] slightly off-topic: Central Auth
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Scot Kreienkamp skre...@la-z-boy.com
wrote:
Hey everyone,
I apologize
On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
Hey everyone,
I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never
setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question
is,
what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG
authentication? From
On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
Hey everyone,
I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never
setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question is,
what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG
authentication? From
Scot Kreienkamp skre...@la-z-boy.com writes:
On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
... We are a largely Windows shop with many app and
database servers running Linux. The Linux environment is growing too
large not to do centralized authentication of some kind.
So I guess what I see
2009/10/17 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
If you decide to go with this approach and use PAM as intermediary,
you'll need the patch I just committed in response to bug #5121 --- it
turns out nobody had ever tried that with Postgres before :-(. But
I think it's also possible to just use PG's
