On 3 March 2016 at 17:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's a syntax issue, so the place to look is
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYNTAX-OPERATORS
Ah, thanks. Perhaps a note in the operators page might be helpful?
I'll change to use <> in place of !=; quite apart
Geoff Winkless writes:
> I was surprised to find that whitespace is required between the !=
> operator and a negative sign, otherwise postgres believes that I'm
> intending !=- as an operator (I get "operator does not exist: integer
> !=- integer").
> This isn't the case with <>-x.
> Is this int
Hi
I was surprised to find that whitespace is required between the !=
operator and a negative sign, otherwise postgres believes that I'm
intending !=- as an operator (I get "operator does not exist: integer
!=- integer").
This isn't the case with <>-x.
Is this intentional? I couldn't find refere
