On 29/09/2011 02:34, J.V. wrote:
Is it possible to group a bunch of methods and functions into a single file (stored
procedures functions) and have a main method that can be called
to orchestrate the methods, pass in params, get back results, log to a file?
I know this can be done with Oracle
Is it possible to group a bunch of methods and functions into a single
file (stored procedures functions) and have a main method that can be
called
to orchestrate the methods, pass in params, get back results, log to a file?
I know this can be done with Oracle PL/SQL but a simple google on
In PostgreSQL (9.x), I have a variable that I want to format with commas.
I do not know how many digits will be in the number, it could be an int
(2Billion+) or a BigInt (18 digits or more).
All I simply want to do is to use: to_number( and have the commas put
in before display.
There are
On 21/09/2011 19:36, J.V. wrote:
In PostgreSQL (9.x), I have a variable that I want to format with commas.
I do not know how many digits will be in the number, it could be an int
(2Billion+) or a BigInt (18 digits or more).
All I simply want to do is to use: to_number( and have the commas
I'm writing a stored procedure that will execute as a trigger.
Arguments being passed to the procedure are field names.
My goal is to convert those field names into the field values. However,
I've not been successful. I thought that the following should have worked.
EXECUTE ''field_val :=
Robert Landrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm writing a stored procedure that will execute as a trigger.
Arguments being passed to the procedure are field names.
My goal is to convert those field names into the field values. However,
I've not been successful. I thought that the following
On 4/7/06, Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're forgetting that (at least in plpgsql), raw queries get
compiled into prepared statements. Prepared statements are faster to
execute than queries that have to be manually parsed every time. Of
course you can pass in prepared statements from
On 4/6/06 12:12 AM, surabhi.ahuja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have heard somewhere that writing a stored procedure, is much better than
firing a sql query(such as select * from table_name) onto the database.
is it true and if yes how?
This isn't going to be true most of the time, I think.
i have heard somewhere that writing a stored procedure, is much better than
firing a sql query(such as select * from table_name) onto the database.
is it true and if yes how?
stored procedures (functions on postgresql) eliminate a lot of
overhead. they also provide a lot of covenience of
Merlin Moncure wrote:
It has been
more or less proven that functional, declaritive style coding has less
errors and is more reliable than mixed sql/procedural applciation code
given developers with equal skill.
I did not know there were empirical studies on this, I would love to be
able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (surabhi.ahuja) writes:
i have heard somewhere that writing a stored procedure, is much
better than firing a sql query(such as select * from
table_name) onto the database.
is it true and if yes how?
It can be way more efficient.
Consider two alternative ways of handling
i have heard somewhere that writinga stored
procedure, is much better than firing a sql query(such as select * from
table_name)onto the database.
is it true and if yes how?
also i want to know that is the performnance in
java slower as compared to cpp, given that the same things is being
I have the following store dproc but when I run it I am
getting the error
ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: (1)
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function irispermissionget
line 9 at return next
What am I doing wrong?
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
public.irispermissionget (username varchar,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:28:45PM -0500, Jason Tesser wrote:
I have the following store dproc but when I run it I am getting the
error
ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: (1)
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function irispermissionget line 9 at return next
What am I doing wrong?
The function
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Egy=FCd_Csaba?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ERROR: Function addincominginvoice(integer, integer, unknown, unknown,
unknown, unknown, integer, unknown, unknown, unknown, unknown,
double precision) does not exist
Unable to identify a function that satisfies the given argument types
cause the error?
Thank you,
-- Csaba
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Egyd Csaba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Stored Proc error after modifying field type
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Egy=FCd_Csaba?= [EMAIL
Sorry for posting many times!
-- Csaba
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 2003. 06. 18.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the
=?iso-8859-2?Q?Egy=FCd_Csaba?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
alumil=# \df addincominginvoice
List of functions
Result data type | Schema |Name|
Argument data types
: [GENERAL] Stored Proc error after modifying field type
=?iso-8859-2?Q?Egy=FCd_Csaba?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
alumil=# \df addincominginvoice
List of
functions
Result data type | Schema |Name|
Argument data types
Tom,
what do you think about the folowing: I updated the server field of my DSN
to point to the postgres runniong under cygwin on the localhost. The error
does not appear at all.
--
1 06:29:42 SQL Prepare: PostgreSQL - { call addincominginvoice
20 matches
Mail list logo
