Hi,
a client of mine is obsessed with the idea of having two postgres
servers looking at the same partition of data... i think i can
configure two servers pointing to the same $PGDATADIR and let one off
and the other on but is it possible for load balancing, i mean with
the two servers active?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Jaime Casanova
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
a client of mine is obsessed with the idea of having two postgres
servers looking at the same partition of data... i think i can
configure two servers pointing to the same $PGDATADIR and let one off
and the other on
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 12:29 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
Hi,
a client of mine is obsessed with the idea of having two postgres
servers looking at the same partition of data... i think i can
configure two servers pointing to the same $PGDATADIR and let one off
and the other on but is it
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
postgresql be running on both at the same time.
More importantly, if you do this, you will probably be able to get the
two postmasters to start up. This will
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
postgresql be running on both at the same time.
More importantly, if you do this, you will
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Jaime Casanova
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
postgresql be
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Jaime Casanova
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
You may have
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 16:23 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
postgresql be running on both at
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Jaime Casanova
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Jaime Casanova
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok... actually i see no real value in that config (create a single
point of contention) but everyone that has used (or at least read
about) oracle think is the best thing to do...
Having dealth with RAC, I can safely say
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:23:15PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
is this true even if one of the server just send SELECTs?
Yep.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
11 matches
Mail list logo