On Wednesday December 21 2005 8:24 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a cluster configured for ~800MB of shared memory
> > cache (shared_buffers = 10), but ipcs shows TWO shared
> > memory segments of ~800MB belonging to that postmaster.
> > What kind of a pro
Ed Loehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday December 21 2005 8:24 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd say that you had a backend crash, causing the postmaster
>> to abandon the original shared memory segment and make a new
>> one, but the old segment is still attached to by a couple of
>> processes.
"Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a cluster configured for ~800MB of shared memory cache
> (shared_buffers = 10), but ipcs shows TWO shared memory
> segments of ~800MB belonging to that postmaster. What kind of
> a problem do I have here?
I'd say that you had a backend crash, caus
I have a cluster configured for ~800MB of shared memory cache
(shared_buffers = 10), but ipcs shows TWO shared memory
segments of ~800MB belonging to that postmaster. What kind of
a problem do I have here?
T ID KEYMODEOWNER GROUP CREATORCGROUP NATTCH
SEGS
