sorry. It is a macro.so, would it be better to
check for the macroas suggested by Tom or go with this patch$ diff -r configure.in configure.in.new918a919>
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for getaddrinfo])920c921,926<
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo])---> AC_TRY_LINK([#include
#include
],>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:33:13PM +0530, R, Rajesh (STSD) wrote:
> Its not a macro.
> I meant that the code generated by AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) by
> configure.in for "configure"
> does not have "#include ". Hence function is not
> detected(unresolved getaddrinfo).
> Hence I thought AC_TR
Message-From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday,
January 17, 2006 8:34 PMTo: R, Rajesh (STSD)Cc:
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better
way to check for getaddrinfo function."R, Rajesh (STSD)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
