Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

2005-04-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > d) Bringing PL/Java into core will force a consistent documentation > > and, I imagine, a chapter of it's own in the main docs. I'm happy > > to write most of it but English is not my native language. Whatever > > I put into print will always benefit from a review. > > T

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

2005-04-02 Thread Rod Taylor
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 21:48 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > d) Bringing PL/Java into core will force a consistent documentation > > > and, I imagine, a chapter of it's own in the main docs. I'm happy > > > to write most of it but English is not my native language. Wha

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

2005-04-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Rod Taylor wrote: > There is nothing stopping additional links to documentation from > being added to the PostgreSQL website in the documentation section. That is true, but that does not foster consistent documentation, which is what Thomas Hallgren wanted. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

2005-04-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
d) Bringing PL/Java into core will force a consistent documentation and, I imagine, a chapter of it's own in the main docs. I'm happy to write most of it but English is not my native language. Whatever I put into print will always benefit from a review. There is nothing stop'ng a chapter being adde