novice wrote:
2008/11/20 Rodrigo E. De León Plicet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:03 PM, novice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry I get nothing :(
Of course not. None of the dates you gave in the example overlap.
But it should still have the 1st entry with the name Ben? Am
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 15:41 +1100, novice wrote:
> omg - how embarrassing.
> so sorry :(
>
I note your name is novice.
Don't sweat it. We are here to help.
Joshua D. Drake
--
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://
> >> sorry I get nothing :(
> >
> > Of course not. None of the dates you gave in the example overlap.
> >
>
> But it should still have the 1st entry with the name Ben? Am I
> missing something?
Ben's issue dates are in the year 2008. The first call entry is
in the year 2007. There are no cust
omg - how embarrassing.
so sorry :(
2008/11/20 brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> novice wrote:
>>
>> 2008/11/20 Rodrigo E. De León Plicet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:03 PM, novice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
sorry I get nothing :(
>>>
>>> Of course not. None of
novice wrote:
2008/11/20 Rodrigo E. De León Plicet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:03 PM, novice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry I get nothing :(
Of course not. None of the dates you gave in the example overlap.
But it should still have the 1st entry with the name Ben? Am
2008/11/20 Rodrigo E. De León Plicet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:03 PM, novice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sorry I get nothing :(
>
> Of course not. None of the dates you gave in the example overlap.
>
But it should still have the 1st entry with the name Ben? Am I
missing
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:03 PM, novice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry I get nothing :(
Of course not. None of the dates you gave in the example overlap.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mai
