Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Of course we would still need to add an EOL page... I think one could make > > a > > strong argument for a static url for EOL info now that windows is EOL for < > > 8.2. > > You could make a strong argument for a page stating that versions > thus-and-so are *already* EOL'd. What the OP seems to be insisting > is that we produce a formal policy and timetable for future EOL > decisions, neither of which seem very likely or desirable to me.
We could record the dates we made versions EOL and they can interpolate from there. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
