Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Guy Rouillier wrote:
Richard P. Welty wrote:
Guy Fraser wrote:
Paypal has a perception issue - they are perceived as being tightly
linked with eBay. That's a problem in the corporate arena. If my
stock broker were to tell me they do all their financial transactions
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
My "bank" is also "not a bank" (they say they are not "FDIC insured"
which I think is the actual problem at hand). Do I have to be worried?
Depends what you use it for. If this is an online bank that you use
only for online transactions and you maintain a balance of sa
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Guy Rouillier wrote:
> >Richard P. Welty wrote:
> >>Guy Fraser wrote:
>
> >Paypal has a perception issue - they are perceived as being tightly
> >linked with eBay. That's a problem in the corporate arena. If my stock
> >broker were to tell me they do all their financia
John DeSoi wrote:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Richard P. Welty wrote:
at the day job, when we switched from paypal (who we found very
undependable)
to authorize.net, we were very pleased to discover that authorize.net
would take
care of the credit card numbers for us, so we didn't have to try
On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Richard P. Welty wrote:
at the day job, when we switched from paypal (who we found very
undependable)
to authorize.net, we were very pleased to discover that
authorize.net would take
care of the credit card numbers for us, so we didn't have to try to
secure them
Guy Rouillier wrote:
Richard P. Welty wrote:
Guy Fraser wrote:
Paypal has a perception issue - they are perceived as being tightly
linked with eBay. That's a problem in the corporate arena. If my stock
broker were to tell me they do all their financial transactions through
Paypal, I'd pro
Richard P. Welty wrote:
Guy Fraser wrote:
Have you thought about setting up an account with PayPal, and having
people pay through PayPal?
Let PayPal deal with the security, and credit card info, after all it's
what they do.
at the day job, when we switched from paypal (who we found very
und
Guy Fraser wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 16:51 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Yes. I agree, in principle, that "don't store them" is the best
advice -- this is standard _Translucent Databases_ advice, too. For
the least-stealable data is the data you don't have.
But if there is a business ca
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 16:51 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:29:02PM +0100, Peter Childs wrote:
> > Unfortunately you still need to store them somewhere, and all systems can
> > be hacked.
>
> Yes. I agree, in principle, that "don't store them" is the best
> advice --
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:29:02PM +0100, Peter Childs wrote:
> Unfortunately you still need to store them somewhere, and all systems can
> be hacked.
Yes. I agree, in principle, that "don't store them" is the best
advice -- this is standard _Translucent Databases_ advice, too. For
the least-
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko Kreen
>Sent: dinsdag 5 juni 2007 21:38
>To: Peter Childs
>Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>Subject: Re: Creditcard Number Security was Re: [GENERAL]
>Encrypted column
&g
On 6/5/07, Peter Childs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 05/06/07, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:28:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > If he is a CC customer, the system (which I am DBA of) bills his
> > card directly, saving the customer much time and e
On 05/06/07, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:28:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> If he is a CC customer, the system (which I am DBA of) bills his
> card directly, saving the customer much time and effort.
So surely what you have is a completely separate s
13 matches
Mail list logo
