Re: Fw: [GENERAL] Talking with other Dbases.

2000-09-28 Thread Adam Haberlach
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:00:20AM -0500, Daryl Chance wrote: > > without knowing the hardware organization & availability of software, > > it's seems strange that you're considering different database systems > > for things that one is perfectly capable of performing. it's a bit of a > > fallacy

Re: Fw: [GENERAL] Talking with other Dbases.

2000-09-28 Thread Daryl Chance
> without knowing the hardware organization & availability of software, > it's seems strange that you're considering different database systems > for things that one is perfectly capable of performing. it's a bit of a > fallacy that MySQL is better for read only database sites. on the low > end

Re: Fw: [GENERAL] Talking with other Dbases.

2000-09-28 Thread Jeff Hoffmann
Daryl Chance wrote: > > > I know MySQL is fast but just remember, it's just "A filesystem with an > > SQL > > > interface" -- that's ALL... :-) > > > > Cool, thats what I needed to know. as for MySQL, thats about all I really > > need :P. without knowing the hardware organization & availability

Fw: [GENERAL] Talking with other Dbases.

2000-09-28 Thread Daryl Chance
oops...meant to send to list. | Daryl Chance | I have made this letter longer then | | Valuedata, LLC | usual because I lacked the time to | | Memphis, TN| make it shorter. -- Blaise Pascal |