RE: [GENERAL] Is Oracle really so much faster

2001-02-02 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> > > However the result was (running on 64bit Sol 7, E250/1Gig > > > RAM) that Oracle was roughly twice as fast. Is this real > > > or might there be stuff I could do, to improve postgres > > > performance? > > > > PostgreSQL version? > 7.0.2 Try 7.1 or use -F. > > You didn't use -F, did you

Re: [GENERAL] Is Oracle really so much faster

2001-02-01 Thread Alvar Freude
Hi, Konstantinos Agouros schrieb: > > When I insert I do something like $dbh->{'AutoCommit'} = 0 and every 100,000 > entries or so I do a commit. try to make the commit every 500 or 1000 inserts. It seems to me, that PG slow down if there are lots of MBs waiting for commit ... And also try to

RE: [GENERAL] Is Oracle really so much faster

2001-02-01 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> try to make the commit every 500 or 1000 inserts. It seems to me, that > PG slow down if there are lots of MBs waiting for commit ... MB == Memory Buffers? If so then it shouldn't be the case for 7.0.X with Tom' work in bufmgr area. Vadim

Re: [GENERAL] Is Oracle really so much faster

2001-02-01 Thread Alvar Freude
Hi, > > try to make the commit every 500 or 1000 inserts. It seems to me, that > > PG slow down if there are lots of MBs waiting for commit ... > > MB == Memory Buffers? > If so then it shouldn't be the case for 7.0.X with Tom' work in bufmgr area. Megabytes :-) tested in 7.1 The inserts slo

RE: [GENERAL] Is Oracle really so much faster

2001-02-01 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> However the result was (running on 64bit Sol 7, E250/1Gig > RAM) that Oracle was roughly twice as fast. Is this real > or might there be stuff I could do, to improve postgres performance? PostgreSQL version? You didn't use -F, did you? Vadim