On 9/1/06, Randall Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:30:57AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> A key tenet of relational thinking is to reduce all information to its
> functional dependencies, and to try and avoid as much as possible
> keeping information state in the data
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:30:57AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 8/31/06, Randall Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Now that I have this query, in order to make my case, I need to "sign
> >off" on all of the individual data that went into it. I would like to
> >do something like:
> >
> >
On 8/31/06, Randall Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that I have this query, in order to make my case, I need to "sign
off" on all of the individual data that went into it. I would like to
do something like:
select last_query_shown_tuples();
schema | table_name | pk_columns | pk
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:17:54AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 8/30/06, Randall Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >An inverted way of thinking about the problem is the notion of getting a
> >source document (say, a "company registration form") and parsing and
> >storing it in a normalized
On 8/30/06, Randall Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm storing facts about an entity (e.g., "company") in a normalized
form with various repeating groups, link tables, etc. My workflow
requires that after (or as part of) collecting these facts, I be able
to "sign off" as having verified all of
