Re: [Bulk] Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-29 Thread Guy Rouillier
Ted Byers wrote: > > 2) Do I need to qualify my references to my tables in the function to > identify the schema in which the tables exist, or will Postgres find > the right tables with the function in its present form? If I have to > further qualify the table references, what is the correct > q

Re: [Bulk] Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Jonel Rienton
Please see below -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Byers Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 7:29 PM To: Frank L. Parks; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

Re: [Bulk] Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Ted Byers
- Original Message - From: "Frank L. Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 7:27 PM Subject: [Bulk] Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway Do you refresh you database after you add the function? It will not show

Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Frank L. Parks
ral@postgresql.org <mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:16 PM *Subject:* Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway yup, just use lowercase all the time

Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Jonel Rienton
Jonel Rienton; pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway Well, I just ran another test and the result indicates the cause of the problem lies elsewhere.  I replaced the original function name with "add_entity" and the end result is

Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Ted Byers
uggestions? - Original Message - From: Jonel Rienton To: 'Ted Byers' ; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:16 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway yup, just use lowercase all the ti

Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Jonel Rienton
yup, just use lowercase all the time From: Ted Byers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:45 PMTo: Jonel Rienton; pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject: Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway Did you find a fix for it? - Original

Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Ted Byers
Did you find a fix for it? - Original Message - From: Jonel Rienton To: 'Ted Byers' ; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:24 PM Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway it's

Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Jonel Rienton
it's because of the mixed-case you're using in the function name, i've had this issue last week myself and it seems to be the culprit From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted ByersSent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 11:13 AMTo: pgsql-general@postgresql.orgSubject:

Re: [GENERAL] Final stored procedure question, for now anyway

2005-12-28 Thread Guy Rouillier
Ted Byers wrote: > It must be stored somewhere since I get an error saying the function > already exists if I attempt to modiy it slightly and re-run it. For > example, I noticed I used the wrong sequence in the last INSERT > statement. To correct that, I had to add "OR REPLACE" after "CREATE" >