On Feb 1, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Israel Brewster writes:
>> So just a bit ago I ran into a bit of excitement when the kernel decided
>> to kill one of my postmaster processes due to an out-of-memory issue,
>
> Fun :-(
>
>> So a single postmaster process was using over 72GB of ra
Israel Brewster writes:
> So just a bit ago I ran into a bit of excitement when the kernel decided
> to kill one of my postmaster processes due to an out-of-memory issue,
Fun :-(
> So a single postmaster process was using over 72GB of ram.
No, the kernel was blaming it for 72GB, which is an ent
