At 11:48 AM 24-11-1999 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > would you like it to work? What parts are too complicated? If they only
>> > *appear* to be so, then this is a documentation deficiency, otherwise
we'd
>> > need to think about it.
>> I think the concept of user friendly design is universal.
> > would you like it to work? What parts are too complicated? If they only
> > *appear* to be so, then this is a documentation deficiency, otherwise we'd
> > need to think about it.
> I think the concept of user friendly design is universal. There should be
> one button in the middle of the scre
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, K.Tao wrote:
> Well I do apologize as all my experiences are in the use of pre 6.5
> versions...I assume there have no longer been any reports of databases
> having to be rebuilt or restored from tape from the way you are talking ;)
>
> Although I still feel that the level o
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Stephen Birch wrote:
> I have been surprised by the response to this question. I was hoping that the
> responses would be more consistent, after all when software is unreliable it
> is generally known by all users.
Steve - I tried to post an answer earlier (and it was verb
