Walter Vaughan wrote:
> Francisco Reyes wrote:
>
> >Walter Vaughan writes:
> >>I am not even sure this is a problem.
> >>INFO: "data_import_customer2": scanned 3000 of 5033 pages, containing
> >>84905 live rows and 0 dead rows; 3000 rows in sample, 142442 estimated
> >>total rows
> >
> >I don't
Walter Vaughan writes:
Well, why did it only scan 3000 pages out of 5033? It decided it didn't need to?
It took a sample and decided it was gonna be okay?
I don't know. Hopefully others with more knowledge can answer.
I think it could be because the pages did not need to be looked at.
Perhap
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Walter Vaughan writes:
I am not even sure this is a problem.
INFO: "data_import_customer2": scanned 3000 of 5033 pages, containing
84905 live rows and 0 dead rows; 3000 rows in sample, 142442 estimated
total rows
I don't believe it is a problem.
I think it is just no
Walter Vaughan writes:
I am not even sure this is a problem.
INFO: "data_import_customer2": scanned 3000 of 5033 pages, containing 84905
live rows and 0 dead rows; 3000 rows in sample, 142442 estimated total rows
I don't believe it is a problem.
I think it is just normal output of the vacuum
