Re[2]: [GENERAL] Re: new type proposal

[Alexey Borzov]

Greetings, Joseph!

At 07.02.2001, 13:13, you wrote:
JS> I noticed that people are ignoring the time created part of my
JS> proposal.  How can a read only field be implemented?  A trigger that
JS> causes and error if that field is updated?
Well, why not just do something like
new.time_created_field := old.time_created_field;
in a BEFORE UPDATE trigger?..


-- 
Yours, Alexey V. Borzov, Webmaster of RDW