Takahashi-san,
> I tried as follows.
> ...
> Unfortunately, this does not work.
> ECPGst_execute seems good, but prepare statement is the same as my
> first post.
Ah right, my bad. The workaround should have been:
EXEC SQL PREPARE test_prep from "SELECT id from test_table where id =
$1";
EXEC SQ
Re: Peter Eisentraut 2019-02-20
<40c5c12f-adad-fc86-7d43-ff7c53535...@2ndquadrant.com>
> > By the same argument, it should always print which variant file was
> > used so determining which _N.out files are still in use is possible.
>
> I would rather not overload the test output even more. A tes
Matsumura-san,
> Maybe, there is no work-around.
Did you analyze the bug? Do you know where it comes from?
> For supporting it, there are two steps.
Could you please start with explaining where you see the problem? I'm
actually not sure what you are trying to do here.
Michael
--
Michael Meske
Corey Huinker wrote:
> Attached is a patch that refactors DELETE triggers to fire at the statement
> level.
>
> I chose delete triggers partly out of simplicity, and partly because there
> some before/after row linkage in the ON UPDATE CASCADE cases where statement
> level triggers might not be
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:09 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> I have modified the patch for the above observations and added a
> commit message as well, see if it looks okay to you.
Looks good to me, thanks.
--
John Naylorhttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:48 PM John Naylor
wrote:
>
> On 2/9/19, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > Shall we add a note to the docs of pg_freespacemap and
> > pgstattuple_approx indicating that for small relations, FSM won't be
> > created, so these functions won't give appropriate value?
>
> I've given
Hello
We increased bgwriter_lru_maxpages limit in 10 release [1]. Docs now are
changed correctly but in REL_10_STABLE postgresql.conf.sample we still have
comment "0-1000 max buffers written/round".
Master (and REL_11_STABLE) was updated later in
611fe7d4793ba6516e839dc50b5319b990283f4f, but n
On 2019-02-19 16:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-02-18 04:58, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> We could remove default privileges from pg_stat_get_activity(). Would
>>> that be a problem?
>>
>> I don't think so, still I am wonder
(2019/02/20 6:48), Tom Lane wrote:
In the case of a standard inheritance or partition tree, this seems to
go through really easily, since all the children could share the same
returned CTID column (I guess you'd also need a TABLEOID column so you
could figure out which table to direct the update
Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> Attached is an updated patch. Thanks for the feedback.
@@ -1755,7 +1755,7 @@ void
multixact_twophase_recover(TransactionId xid, uint16 info,
void *recdata, uint32 len)
{
- BackendId dummyBackendId = TwoPhaseGetDummyBackendId(xid);
+
Hi,
Maybe, there is no work-around.
For supporting it, there are two steps.
step1. fix for PREPARE.
step2. fix for EXECUTE.
About step1, there are two way.
I want to choose Idea-2.
Idea-1.
ecpglib prepares Oids of type listed in PREPARE statement for 5th argument of
PQprepare().
But it's dif
On 2019-02-15 16:05, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Andrew Gierth 2019-02-15 <874l95m8w7@news-spur.riddles.org.uk>
>> Also while we're tweaking regression test output, would it be possible
>> to have some indicator of whether a test passed because a variant file
>> in the resultmap was ignored in
On 2019-01-03 12:16, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 03/01/2019 10:39, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> It will especially say which _alternate.out file was used, which seems
>> like a big win. So +1.
>
> It already shows that in the existing diff output header.
>
> Although if you have a really long absolu
On 2019-02-18 16:32, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Considering this is only the second encryption protocol in the project's
> lifetime, I agree that using callbacks would be overkill here. What
> other encryption protocols are you thinking we would be adding here? I
> think most would be quite hard-pres
В письме от вторник, 29 января 2019 г. 20:43:07 MSK пользователь Dmitry
Belyavsky написал:
> Dear all,
>
> Please find attached the patch extending the sets of symbols allowed in
> ltree labels. The patch introduces 2 variants of escaping symbols, via
> backslashing separate symbols and via quoti
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 5:17 AM Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:15 AM Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:21:19PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:57 PM Magnus Hagander
>> wrote:
>> >> I think it could be argued that neither i
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 23:09, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 7:25 AM Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > Could we get an similarly optimized implementation of -> operator for
> JSONB as well?
> > Are there any other potential uses? Best to fix em all up at once and
> then move on to other thi
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:14:07PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> @@ -811,6 +811,9 @@ TwoPhaseGetGXact(TransactionId xid)
> static TransactionId cached_xid = InvalidTransactionId;
> static GlobalTransaction cached_gxact = NULL;
>
> + Assert(!lock_held ||
> +
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
