Subject: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?
Was this just forgotten?
Probably? Attached a patch.
--
Fabien.diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_checksums.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_checksums.sgml
index a0ffeb0ab0..5549ea679a 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_checksums.sgml
+++ b/doc
Was this just forgotten?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 08:35, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> How do I get rid of this slot ?
>
> select pg_drop_replication_slot('mysub');
> ERROR: replication slot "mysub" is active for PID 13065
> test_database=# select * from pg_subscription;
> subdbid | subname | subowner | subenabled | subconninfo
On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 04:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> David Rowley writes:
> > 0003: Adds a new function named appendStringInfoStringInfo() which
> > appends one StringInfo onto another. Various places did this using
> > appendStringInfoString(), but that required a needless strlen() call.
>
> I can
Hello hackers,
Please also consider fixing the following inconsistencies found in new
v12 code:
1. AT_AddOids - remove (orphaned after 578b2297)
2. BeingModified ->TM_BeingModified (for consistency)
3. copy_relation_data -> remove (orphaned after d25f5191)
4. endblock -> endblk (an internal incon
Hello PostgreSQL Mentors,
Hello, my name is Sharon Clark and I’m a technical writer interested in the
Google Season of Docs (GSoD) project for PostgreSQL. My interest stems from
working with developers and moving toward software documentation. The GSoD
project is a great opportunity for me to w
David Rowley writes:
> Here's a small patch series aimed to both clean up a few misuses of
> string functions and also to optimise a few things along the way.
> 0001: Converts various call that use appendPQExpBuffer() that really
> should use appendPQExrBufferStr(). If there's no formatting then
David Rowley writes:
> If we're doing an API break for this, wouldn't it be better to come up
> with something that didn't have to shuffle list elements around every
> time one is deleted?
Agreed that as long as there's an API break anyway, we could consider
more extensive changes for this use-ca
I wrote:
> Here's a new version of the Lists-as-arrays patch.
The cfbot noticed a set-but-not-used variable that my compiler hadn't
whined about. Here's a v5 to pacify it. No other changes.
regards, tom lane
reimplement-List-as-array-5.patch.gz
Description: reimplemen
Amit Kapila writes:
> I have taken one pass over it and all fixes seem to be correct and got
> introduced in v12. I will re-verify them once again and then commit
> your patch if I don't found any problem. In the meantime, if anyone
> else wants to look at it, that would be great.
FWIW, I'd cou
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 4:23 PM Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Hello Amit,
>
> 25.05.2019 13:42, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I think it is good to fix these. I haven't verified all but I can
> > review them. Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of
> > multiple patches?
>
> If a single patch
How do I get rid of this slot ?
select pg_drop_replication_slot('mysub');
ERROR: replication slot "mysub" is active for PID 13065
test_database=# select * from pg_subscription;
subdbid | subname | subowner | subenabled | subconninfo | subslotname |
subsynccommit | subpublications
-+-
Hello Amit,
25.05.2019 13:42, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think it is good to fix these. I haven't verified all but I can
> review them. Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of
> multiple patches?
If a single patch is more convenient, then here it is.
I thought that separate patches woul
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 3:56 PM Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Hello hackers,
>
> I've done another round of cross-checking the master branch for new
> unique identifiers/words. As my previous attempt to fix things was not
> noticed, now I'm focusing on distinct typos.
> 1. authenticaion (user-visibl
Hello hackers,
I've done another round of cross-checking the master branch for new
unique identifiers/words. As my previous attempt to fix things was not
noticed, now I'm focusing on distinct typos.
1. authenticaion (user-visible string)
2. becuase
3. checkinunique
4. cheep
5. comparion (user-visi
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 8:43 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:56 PM Euler Taveira wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that v12 release notes is referencing the wrong GUC. It
> > should be recovery_target_timeline instead of recovery_target_time.
> > Patch attached.
> >
>
> Yo
Here's a small patch series aimed to both clean up a few misuses of
string functions and also to optimise a few things along the way.
0001: Converts various call that use appendPQExpBuffer() that really
should use appendPQExrBufferStr(). If there's no formatting then
using the former function is
17 matches
Mail list logo
