Hi,
Here the generated v2 of the Patch.
Thanks
Fabrice
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 8:28 AM shveta malik wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 9:52 PM Fabrice Chapuis
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Shveta,
> >
> > Here is the version 1 of the patch with corrections
> >
>
> Thanks. We can bump the version to v2 n
On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:46:11 +0900
Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 10:24 AM Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > Fujii-san, thank you for committing the patch that fixes the assertion
> > failure.
> > I've attached the remaining patches so that cfbot stays green.
>
> Thanks for reattaching the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 5:36 PM Chao Li wrote:
> “same file" was a mistake. windows-949-2000.ucm is a different file from
> gb-18030-2000(2022).ucm.
>
> In theory, we don’t need to change UHC if our goal is to delete
> gb-18030-2000.xml.
That was my goal, yes. Let's stay focused on that and not
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 7:28 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 10:43 PM shveta malik wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 12:46 AM Masahiko Sawada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 4:57 AM shveta malik
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 3:2
Dear Robert.
With regard to the mail, I firstly apologise for the confusion created
regarding authorship. The patch was developed as part of my work in my
official email id and the patch was committed under my personal GitHub
account during collaborative development. Going forward, I will make sur
On 27.09.25 12:43, David Rowley wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sept 2025 at 15:52, David Rowley wrote:
Updated patch attached. Thanks for the review.
Now pushed and awaiting buildfarm feedback.
Cool, seems to work. I also tried it on CI by removing a few "silence
compiler warning" lines.
Quick foll
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 9:03 AM Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> I observed that pgstat_btree_page() incorporates the count of new
> pages into its free space calculation[1]. Does it make sense to do the
> same for hash and gist as well as we are leaning towards making these
> consistent.
>
> [1]
> if (Page
On Mon, 29 Sept 2025 at 08:58, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Shlok,
>
> I was looking at the recent v24 changes.
>
> ==
> GENERAL.
>
> I saw that you modified the system view to add a new flag:
>
> +
> +
> + exceptcol bool
> +
> +
> + True if a column list with E
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:01 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 03:15:37PM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > I'm wary of letting unprivileged users switch this implementation. I
> > think our developers should be allowed to treat the user as an
> > adversary when developing feat
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 03:15:37PM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> I'm wary of letting unprivileged users switch this implementation. I
> think our developers should be allowed to treat the user as an
> adversary when developing features on top of pg_strong_random(), and
> it doesn't make sense for
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 01:19:05PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> NULL is a valid Bitmapset, so I don't really see the need to check for
> an empty set before calling bms_free(). If those were removed, then
> you'd not have to care about the coverage of that line.
Yeah, we could just remove them as
Hello,
I was thinking about your (Tom's) idea of having some sort of header
inclusion policy. Our current situation is that cross-module inclusions
are quite widespread and the dependencies can probably be seen as a
tight web (modules probably being defined as our subdirectories inside
src/includ
On Sat, 27 Sept 2025 at 01:20, Shlok Kyal wrote:
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> I have addressed the comments and attached the updated version.
If all columns are excluded, we do not publish the changes. However,
when a table has no columns, the data is still replicated. Should we
make thi
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 8:11 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't have a clear explanation for that slowness either, but the
> patch cuts down the runtime by 89% on my machine.
Nice! I'll clean this up, and put a rewrite on the back burner for
now. Thanks everyone for the testing, and thanks Andres fo
Hello hackers,
I am back at this work with a rebased and revised patch. The new version is
rebased and has a change in approach.
Whenever we are using non-cursor mode, for the first cursor we are always
saving the tuples
in the tuplestore, this is because we do not have any means to know
beforehan
Hi,
Reading find_window_run_conditions() the RangeTableEntry *rte parameter
is not being used by find_window_run_conditions() and
check_and_push_window_quals(). The attached patch remove this parameter
from both functions.
The 4be9024d573 also remove unused parameter for both functions and
after
16 matches
Mail list logo