Hello Fabien, Sorry for not responding for long time.
> Two typos: > - "usinng" -> "using" > - "a rejection method used" -> "a rejection method is used" > > I'm not sure of "least_recently_used_i", this naming style is not used in > pgbench. "least_recently_used" would be ok. > > "..nb_cells.. != ZIPF_CACHE_SIZE", ISTM that "<" is more logical, > even if the result is the same? Fixed. > Maybe the cache overflow could be counted, to allow for a possible warning > message in the final report? Also done. But one question: Should it be done by printing to stdout or stderr ? > When/if the pgbench tap test patch get through, coverage tests should > be added. I have added few tests and I am not sure if they OK or not. It was my first experience with perl and tests in PostgreSQL.
pgbench-zipf-09v.patch
Description: Binary data
— Thanks and Regards, Alik Khilazhev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
