On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 08:12, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15.06.2023 1:23 AM, James Addison wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 07:55, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
>
> On 12.06.2023 3:23 PM, Pavel Borisov wrote:
>
> Is the following true or not?
>
&g
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 07:55, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12.06.2023 3:23 PM, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> > Is the following true or not?
> >
> > 1. If we switch processes to threads but leave the amount of session
> > local variables unchanged, there would be hardly any performance gain.
>
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 20:48, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 3:16 PM James Addison wrote:
> > I think that they're practical performance-related questions about the
> > benefits of performing a technical migration that could involve
> > significant deve
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 20:24, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-06-12 16:23:14 +0400, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> > Is the following true or not?
> >
> > 1. If we switch processes to threads but leave the amount of session
> > local variables unchanged, there would be hardly any performance
I don't have an objection, but I do wonder: can one (or perhaps a few)
queries/workloads be provided where threading would be significantly
beneficial?
(some material there could help get people on-board with the idea and
potentially guide many of the smaller questions that arise along the
way)
