Glad to hear it. Thank you!
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 2:50 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 03:59:08PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > Nice... LGTM!
>
> I have noticed that this was still in the CF. After fixing a couple
> of inconsistencies in the markups and the na
> I think this should say something more like "Here is how an extension
> SQL script might create a table access method handler".
Fair point. It is referred to elsewhere [0] in docs as a "script
file", so I've done that.
> Shouldn't "mem_tableam_handler" be "my_tableam_handler"?
Sorry about that
> I took a look at this patch and I don't think this is a very good
> idea,
No problem! I've dropped the v2 code additions and stuck with the v1
attempt plus feedback.
Thank you!
Phil
v3-0001-Add-minimal-C-example-and-SQL-registration-exampl.patch
Description: Binary data
>
> > There is a previous patch [1] around the same topic. What about joining
> > efforts on pointing these documentation changes to the proposed test module?
> >
> > [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4588/
>
> Looking over this thread, I see that it was mo
