On 16 March 2018 at 03:57, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>
>> Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>>
>> > And what happen if somebody concurrently set (fastupdate = on)?
>> > Can we miss conflicts because of that?
>>
>> I think it'd be better to have
On 07-Mar-2018 11:00 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" wrote:
I suggest to create a new function GinPredicateLockPage() that checks
whether fast update is enabled for the index. The current arrangement
looks too repetitive and it seems easy to make a mistake.
Stylistically, please keep #include lines ordere
On 28 February 2018 at 05:51, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:31 AM, Shubham Barai
> wrote:
> > I have created new isolation tests. Please have a look at
> > updated patch.
>
> Hi Shubham,
>
> Could we please have a rebased version of the gin o
On 25 January 2018 at 18:40, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Shubham Barai
> wrote:
>
>> The previous patch couldn't be applied cleanly because there were some
>> modifications to isolation_schedule. I have updated the patch now.
&g
On 15 January 2018 at 08:03, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greeting Shubham, all,
>
> * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Shubham Barai
> > wrote:
> > > I have attached the rebased version of patch here.
> >
&g
On 8 January 2018 at 23:13, Shubham Barai wrote:
>
>
> On 8 January 2018 at 22:44, Shubham Barai
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5 January 2018 at 03:18, Alexander Korotkov > > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Andrey Borodin
>&g
On 8 January 2018 at 22:44, Shubham Barai wrote:
>
>
> On 5 January 2018 at 03:18, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Andrey Borodin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 29 нояб. 2017 г., в 22:50, Shubham Barai
>>> написал(а):
&g
On 5 January 2018 at 03:18, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Andrey Borodin
> wrote:
>
>> 29 нояб. 2017 г., в 22:50, Shubham Barai
>> написал(а):
>>
>> I have fixed formatting style. Please take a look at updated patch.
>>
>
On 2 October 2017 at 22:21, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Shubham Barai
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, page-level predicate locking should happen only when fast update is
>> off.
>> Actually, I forgot to put conditions in updated patch. Does
On 27 November 2017 at 13:17, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> Hi, Shubham!
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Shubham Barai
> wrote:
>
>> On 9 October 2017 at 18:57, Alexander Korotkov > > wrote:
>>
>>> Now, ITSM that predicate locks and conflict checks
10 matches
Mail list logo
