On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:56:41PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> But this patch was quite useful while debugging some of the other
> ongoing SSL work. So if it were revived at some point in the future, it
> would be welcome.
+1!
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 3/1/18 20:48, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-01-17 09:03:51 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Graham, will you be able to respond to my questions or provide an
>> updated patch within the next week or so?
>
> Given that nothing has happend since, I've marked this as returned with
> feedback.
A
On 2018-01-17 09:03:51 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Graham, will you be able to respond to my questions or provide an
> updated patch within the next week or so?
Given that nothing has happend since, I've marked this as returned with
feedback.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Graham, will you be able to respond to my questions or provide an
updated patch within the next week or so?
On 1/2/18 09:17, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The server-side changes look pretty reasonable.
>
> On the client side, I'd like to see some comments explaining the
> business around ssl_ex_dat
On 11/11/17 05:50, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2017, at 6:23 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>>> Currently neither the server side nor the client side SSL certificate
>>> verify callback does anything, leading to potential hair-tearing-out
>>> moments.
>>>
>>> The following patch to master i
