Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Jesper Pedersen wrote: > Small typo. Thanks. That just proves no task is so simple that I can't foul it up. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Thomas Munro wrote: > Thanks. You're right. Rebased and updated to describe what "off" does. Committed. I noticed that you didn't add the new GUC to postgresql.conf.sample, so I did that. But then I thought it didn't really

Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> How about parallel_leader_participation = on|off? The attached >> version has it that way, and adds regression tests to