On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:22 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > What do you think? Anybody else has an opinion on whether to
> > > back-patch this or not?
> >
> > As nobody except Chris complained about this so far, maybe no?
> >
>
> Fa
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Thank you Chris, Amit.
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:46 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:55 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry for these troubles. Attached are patches created using `git
> > > format-patch -n -
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:21 PM Chris Bandy wrote:
>
> On 3/18/20 11:46 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:55 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Sorry for these troubles. Attached are patches created using `git
> >> format-patch -n -v6` on master at 487e9861d0.
> >>
> >
> > No
On 3/18/20 11:46 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:55 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sorry for these troubles. Attached are patches created using `git
>> format-patch -n -v6` on master at 487e9861d0.
>>
>
> No problem. I have extracted your code changes as a separate patch
> (se
Thank you Chris, Amit.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:46 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:55 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sorry for these troubles. Attached are patches created using `git
> > format-patch -n -v6` on master at 487e9861d0.
> >
>
> No problem. I have extracted you
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:55 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
>
>
> Sorry for these troubles. Attached are patches created using `git
> format-patch -n -v6` on master at 487e9861d0.
>
No problem. I have extracted your code changes as a separate patch
(see attached) as I am not sure we want to add tests for
On 3/18/20 6:56 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:46 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:51 PM Chris Bandy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/11/20 6:29 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
I have tried with git am as well, but it failed. I am not sure what
is the reason. C
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:46 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:51 PM Chris Bandy wrote:
> >
> > On 3/11/20 6:29 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > >
> > > I have tried with git am as well, but it failed. I am not sure what
> > > is the reason. Can you please once check at your end?
>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:51 PM Chris Bandy wrote:
>
> On 3/11/20 6:29 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > I have tried with git am as well, but it failed. I am not sure what
> > is the reason. Can you please once check at your end?
>
> Yes, sorry. This set (and v3 and v4) should work with -p0. Any f
Amit,
On 3/11/20 6:29 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:05 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
>>
>> On 3/1/20 10:09 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
On 3/1/20 5:14 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 10:10 AM
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:05 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
>
> On 3/1/20 10:09 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
> >> On 3/1/20 5:14 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 10:10 AM Amit Langote
> >>> wrote:
>
> There a
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:48 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
>
> On 3/3/20 10:08 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> +\set VERBOSITY verbose
> >> +-- no partitions
> >> +CREATE TABLE pterr1 (x int, y int, PRIMARY KEY (x, y)) PARTITION BY RANGE
> >> (y);
> >> +INSERT INTO pterr1 VALUES (10, 10);
> >> +ERROR: 23
On 3/3/20 10:08 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
+\set VERBOSITY verbose
+-- no partitions
+CREATE TABLE pterr1 (x int, y int, PRIMARY KEY (x, y)) PARTITION BY RANGE (y);
+INSERT INTO pterr1 VALUES (10, 10);
+ERROR: 23514: no partition of relation "pterr1" found for row
+DETAIL: Partition key of the f
> +\set VERBOSITY verbose
> +-- no partitions
> +CREATE TABLE pterr1 (x int, y int, PRIMARY KEY (x, y)) PARTITION BY RANGE
> (y);
> +INSERT INTO pterr1 VALUES (10, 10);
> +ERROR: 23514: no partition of relation "pterr1" found for row
> +DETAIL: Partition key of the failing row contains (y) = (10
On 3/1/20 10:09 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
On 3/1/20 5:14 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 10:10 AM Amit Langote wrote:
There are couple more instances in src/backend/command/tablecmds.c
where partition constraint is che
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:39 AM Amit Langote wrote:
>
>
> > My (very limited) understanding is that partition
> > "constraints" are entirely contained within pg_class.relpartbound of the
> > partition.
>
> That is correct.
>
> > Are you suggesting that the table name go into the constraint name fie
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
> On 3/1/20 5:14 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 10:10 AM Amit Langote
> > wrote:
> >> This makes sense to me. Btree code which implements unique
> >> constraints also does this; see _bt_check_unique() function in
>
Thank you both for look at this!
On 3/1/20 5:14 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 10:10 AM Amit Langote wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:34 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing telemetry data into a table partitioned by time. When there
is no partition for a parti
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 10:10 AM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:34 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm writing telemetry data into a table partitioned by time. When there
> > is no partition for a particular date, my app notices the constraint
> > violation
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:34 AM Chris Bandy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing telemetry data into a table partitioned by time. When there
> is no partition for a particular date, my app notices the constraint
> violation, creates the partition, and retries the insert.
>
> I'm used to handl
for my use case:
- Insert data into a partitioned table for which there is no partition.
- Insert data directly into an incorrect partition.
Thanks,
Chris
>From 8261b366c49b2d04baeb882d39dfa626b9315889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bandy
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:47:56 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Ad
21 matches
Mail list logo
