Em qui., 23 de abr. de 2020 às 16:43, Alvaro Herrera <
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu:
> On 2020-Apr-16, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> > When multiplying variables, the overflow will take place anyway, and only
> > then will the meaningless product be explicitly promoted to type int64.
> > It is on
Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> When multiplying variables, the overflow will take place anyway, and only
>> then will the meaningless product be explicitly promoted to type int64.
>> It is one of the operands that should have been cast instead to avoid the
>> overflow.
>>
>> - if (state->availMem <
On 2020-Apr-16, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> When multiplying variables, the overflow will take place anyway, and only
> then will the meaningless product be explicitly promoted to type int64.
> It is one of the operands that should have been cast instead to avoid the
> overflow.
>
> - if (state->avai
Hi,
When multiplying variables, the overflow will take place anyway, and only
then will the meaningless product be explicitly promoted to type int64.
It is one of the operands that should have been cast instead to avoid the
overflow.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
tuplesort_avoid_possible_overflow.patc