Re: [PATCH] Refactor bytea_sortsupport(), take two

2025-08-11 Thread John Naylor
On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 6:44 PM Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > > Hi, > > > This is a follow-up to b45242fd30ff [1]. Previously we separated > > varlena.c into varlena.c and bytea.c. This patch makes > > bytea_sortsupport() independent from varlena.c code as it was proposed > > before [2][3]. The bene

Re: [PATCH] Refactor bytea_sortsupport(), take two

2025-08-07 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi, > This is a follow-up to b45242fd30ff [1]. Previously we separated > varlena.c into varlena.c and bytea.c. This patch makes > bytea_sortsupport() independent from varlena.c code as it was proposed > before [2][3]. The benefits of this change are summarized in the > commit message that I includ

[PATCH] Refactor bytea_sortsupport(), take two

2025-07-02 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi, This is a follow-up to b45242fd30ff [1]. Previously we separated varlena.c into varlena.c and bytea.c. This patch makes bytea_sortsupport() independent from varlena.c code as it was proposed before [2][3]. The benefits of this change are summarized in the commit message that I included to the