On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:57:04PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> Unfortunately, there are quite a few issues with what you have:
This review has not been answered after two weeks, so this is marked
as RwF.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:57:04PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 20:41, Pierre Ducroquet wrote:
> >
> > In a recent audit, I noticed that application developers have a tendency to
> > abuse the distinct clause. For instance they use an ORM and add a distinct
> > at
> > the
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 20:41, Pierre Ducroquet wrote:
>
> In a recent audit, I noticed that application developers have a tendency to
> abuse the distinct clause. For instance they use an ORM and add a distinct at
> the top level just because they don't know the cost it has, or they don't know
>
Hi Pierre,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 2:11 PM Pierre Ducroquet wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> In a recent audit, I noticed that application developers have a tendency to
> abuse the distinct clause. For instance they use an ORM and add a distinct at
> the top level just because they don't know the cost it has,
Hi
In a recent audit, I noticed that application developers have a tendency to
abuse the distinct clause. For instance they use an ORM and add a distinct at
the top level just because they don't know the cost it has, or they don't know
that using EXISTS is a better way to express their queries
