On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:26:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-10-29 03:44, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
> > index 4e833d79ef..be4292ec33 100644
> > --- a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
> > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
> > @@
On 2020-11-21 20:41, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:26:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 2020-10-29 03:44, Justin Pryzby wrote:
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
index 4e833d79ef..be4292ec33 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
+++ b/doc/
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:04 PM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 2020-11-21 20:41, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Oops. I guess I'd write something like this. If we just remove it, then
> > there'd no place to add a new server application, and "client applications"
> > would be the only subsection.
>
> I
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:13:24PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I would like to commit this, because "waiting restore commands" have
> confusing interactions with my proposed prefetching-during-recovery
> patch[1]. Here's a version that fixes an error when building the docs
> (there was a stray re
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:06 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:13:24PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I would like to commit this, because "waiting restore commands" have
> > confusing interactions with my proposed prefetching-during-recovery
> > patch[1]. Here's a version th
On 2021/01/27 14:32, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:06 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:13:24PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
I would like to commit this, because "waiting restore commands" have
confusing interactions with my proposed prefetching-during-recov
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:08:56PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> But one question is; shouldn't we follow "usual" way to retire the
> feature instead of dropping that immediately? That is, mark
> pg_standby as obsolete, announce that pg_standby will be dropped
> after several releases, and then drop
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:36 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:08:56PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > But one question is; shouldn't we follow "usual" way to retire the
> > feature instead of dropping that immediately? That is, mark
> > pg_standby as obsolete, announce that pg_
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:13 AM Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:36 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:08:56PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > But one question is; shouldn't we follow "usual" way to retire the
> > > feature instead of dropping that immediatel
