On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:28:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I pushed some fixes produced here. Attached is the remainder of the
>> patch you submitted. I notice now that we haven't actually fixed
>> Peter's
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:28:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I pushed some fixes produced here. Attached is the remainder of the
> patch you submitted. I notice now that we haven't actually fixed
> Peter's source of complaint, though. AFAICS your patch just adds test
> cases, and upthread
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:38:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Perhaps, I'm just repeating what's already been said, but I think it might
> be better to have the word "partitioned" in the message.
That's what Peter is pointing to upthread and what the v1 of upthread
was doing. I would tend to
Hi.
On 2018/05/02 11:05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 12:30:44PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> However, backing up a minute, I don't think "relation \"%s\" is not a
>> btree index" is such a terrible message. These modules are intended
>> to be intended by people who Know What