Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs

2024-07-15 Thread Amit Langote
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 8:22 PM jian he wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:14 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > On 20.05.24 02:00, jian he wrote: > > >> removing parentheses means we need to rephrase this sentence? > > >> So I come up with the following rephrase: > > >> > > >> The context_item s

Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs

2024-05-22 Thread jian he
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:14 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 20.05.24 02:00, jian he wrote: > >> removing parentheses means we need to rephrase this sentence? > >> So I come up with the following rephrase: > >> > >> The context_item specifies the input data to query, the > >> path_expression is

Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs

2024-05-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 20.05.24 02:00, jian he wrote: removing parentheses means we need to rephrase this sentence? So I come up with the following rephrase: The context_item specifies the input data to query, the path_expression is a JSON path expression defining the query, json_path_name is an optional name for t

Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs

2024-05-19 Thread jian he
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:14 PM jian he wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 8:34 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > > > On 15 May 2024, at 14:04, Marcos Pegoraro wrote: > > > > > Why (context_item), (path_expression) and (json_path_name) are inside a > > > parentheses ? This is not usual when ex

Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs

2024-05-15 Thread jian he
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 8:34 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > On 15 May 2024, at 14:04, Marcos Pegoraro wrote: > > > Why (context_item), (path_expression) and (json_path_name) are inside a > > parentheses ? This is not usual when explaining any other feature. > > Agreed, that's inconsisent with

Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs

2024-05-15 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 15 May 2024, at 14:04, Marcos Pegoraro wrote: > Why (context_item), (path_expression) and (json_path_name) are inside a > parentheses ? This is not usual when explaining any other feature. Agreed, that's inconsisent with how for example json_table_column is documented in the next list ite

in parentesis is not usual on DOCs

2024-05-15 Thread Marcos Pegoraro
This page has 3 items that are between parentheses, there is an explanation why they are used this way ? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-json.html#FUNCTIONS-SQLJSON-TABLE Each syntax element is described below in more detail. *context_item*, *path_expression* [ AS *json_path_name