At Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:56:28 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> It just means that I am not much a fan of the signature changes done
> for RecordTransactionCommit() and AtEOXact_PgStat_Database(), adding a
> dependency to a specify L
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:56 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > On 2/19/24 07:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >>> 1) Do we really need to modify RecordTransactionCommitPrep
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:30 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> > I've previously noted in "Add last commit LSN to
> > pg_last_committed_xact()" [1] that it's not possible to monitor how
> > many bytes of WAL behind a logical replication slot is (computing such
> > is obviously trivial for physical
Hi James,
There are some review in the thread that need to be addressed.
it seems that we need to mark this entry "Waiting on Author" and move to
the next CF [0].
Thanks
[0] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4355/
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 at 05:27, James Coleman wrote:
> I've previously noted i
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Hello
I think it is convenient to know the last commit LSN of a data
I've previously noted in "Add last commit LSN to
pg_last_committed_xact()" [1] that it's not possible to monitor how
many bytes of WAL behind a logical replication slot is (computing such
is obviously trivial for physical slots) because the slot doesn't need
to replicate beyond the last commit. In
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:26:43AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 2/19/24 07:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> 1) Do we really need to modify RecordTransactionCommitPrepared and
>>> XactLogCommitRecord to return the LSN of the commit r
On 2/19/24 07:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Thanks for the updated patch. I don't have a clear opinion on the
>> feature and whether this is the way to implement it, but I have two
>> simple questions.
>
> Some users I know of would b
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Thanks for the updated patch. I don't have a clear opinion on the
> feature and whether this is the way to implement it, but I have two
> simple questions.
Some users I know of would be really happy to be able to get this
information
Hi James,
Thanks for the updated patch. I don't have a clear opinion on the
feature and whether this is the way to implement it, but I have two
simple questions.
1) Do we really need to modify RecordTransactionCommitPrepared and
XactLogCommitRecord to return the LSN of the commit record? Can't we
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:26 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> 2024-01 Commitfest.
>
> Hi, This patch has a CF status of "Needs Review", but it seems like
> there was some CFbot test failure last time it was run [1]. Please
> have a look and post an updated version if necessary.
>
> ==
> [1]
> https
2024-01 Commitfest.
Hi, This patch has a CF status of "Needs Review", but it seems like
there was some CFbot test failure last time it was run [1]. Please
have a look and post an updated version if necessary.
==
[1] https://cirrus-ci.com/github/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/commitfest/46/4355
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 6:01 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 at 07:57, James Coleman wrote:
> >
> > I've previously noted in "Add last commit LSN to
> > pg_last_committed_xact()" [1] that it's not possible to monitor how
> > many bytes of WAL behind a logical replication slot is (comp
Hello,
Thanks for reviewing!
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 8:16 AM Aleksander Alekseev
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > [...]
> > As I was thinking about how to improve things, I realized that this
> > information (since it's for monitoring anyway) fits more naturally
> > into the stats system. I'd originally tho
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 at 07:57, James Coleman wrote:
>
> I've previously noted in "Add last commit LSN to
> pg_last_committed_xact()" [1] that it's not possible to monitor how
> many bytes of WAL behind a logical replication slot is (computing such
> is obviously trivial for physical slots) because
Hi,
> [...]
> As I was thinking about how to improve things, I realized that this
> information (since it's for monitoring anyway) fits more naturally
> into the stats system. I'd originally thought of exposing it in
> pg_stat_wal, but that's per-cluster rather than per-database (indeed,
> this is
I've previously noted in "Add last commit LSN to
pg_last_committed_xact()" [1] that it's not possible to monitor how
many bytes of WAL behind a logical replication slot is (computing such
is obviously trivial for physical slots) because the slot doesn't need
to replicate beyond the last commit. In
17 matches
Mail list logo
