Hi,
On 2025-09-16 15:50:20 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 02:06:03PM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> > Presumably this was `PgAioHandle io_handles[]` at some point, but now
> > that it's a pointer it's a proper part of the struct's own size, and
> > should be treated
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 02:06:03PM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Presumably this was `PgAioHandle io_handles[]` at some point, but now
> that it's a pointer it's a proper part of the struct's own size, and
> should be treated as such for memory accounting.
I would bet on a FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_M
On Mon, 15 Sept 2025 at 13:33, Madhukar . wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> While reviewing AIO code, we found an issue with AioCtlShmemSize function.
> The function was not accounting for io_handles which is used post shared
> memory alloc in AioShmemInit.
Good catch.
Presumably this was `PgAioHandle
Hi Folks,
While reviewing AIO code, we found an issue with AioCtlShmemSize function.
The function was not accounting for io_handles which is used post shared
memory alloc in AioShmemInit. Please find a patch to account for
io_handles member of PgAioCtl.
The patch uses sizeof(PgAioCtl) instead of
