Firstly, thank you for your reply.
Yeah, I think maybe just assigning tts_tableOid of TTS only once
during scanning the same table may be better. That really needs
to be thinked over.
Regards,
Wenchao
Peter Geoghegan 于2022年9月28日周三 10:47写道：
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:51 PM Wenchao Zhang
> wro
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:51 PM Wenchao Zhang wrote:
> We can get the two assigned values are same by reading codes. Maybe we should
> remove one?
>
> What's more, we find that maybe we assign slot->tts_tableOid in outer
> interface like table_scan_getnextslot may be better and more friendly wh
Hi hackers,
Recently, we discover that the field of tts_tableOid of TupleTableSlot is
assigned duplicated in table AM's interface which is not necessary. For
example, in table_scan_getnextslot,
```
static inline bool
table_scan_getnextslot(TableScanDesc sscan, ScanDirection direction,
TupleTableS
