On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 08:10:55PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Thanks for the commit, Michael.
Sorry for the lack of update here. For the sake of the archives, this
is f1e9f6b.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Em sex, 28 de jul de 2023 11:54 PM, Michael Paquier
escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:45:22PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > Skimming the tree there doesn't seem to be any callers which aren't
> exiting or
> > ereporting on failure so the real-world impact seems low. That being
> said,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:45:22PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Skimming the tree there doesn't seem to be any callers which aren't exiting or
> ereporting on failure so the real-world impact seems low. That being said,
> silencing static analyzers could be reason enough to delay allocation.
> On 25 Jul 2023, at 16:31, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> rmtree function can leak 64 bytes per call,
> when it can't open a directory.
Skimming the tree there doesn't seem to be any callers which aren't exiting or
ereporting on failure so the real-world impact seems low. That being said,
silencing s
Hi,
Per Coverity.
rmtree function can leak 64 bytes per call,
when it can't open a directory.
patch attached.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
0003-Avoid-possible-memory-leak-64-bytes-per-rmtree-call-.patch
Description: Binary data
