On 19.01.24 18:12, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
Thanks,
This patch brought it further and indeed, the resulting libpq.so file is
unversioned when built for Android while it's versioned when built for
linux.
Ok, I have committed all of this now:
- Fix for correct order of host_system and portname as
Thanks,
This patch brought it further and indeed, the resulting libpq.so file is
unversioned when built for Android while it's versioned when built for
linux.
Matthias
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 3:00 PM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 19.01.24 11:08, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > When trying to build wit
On 19.01.24 11:08, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
When trying to build with meson, including the patch which was provided
by Andres Freud (thanks),
I am currently stuck with the following error:
Configuring pg_config_ext.h using configuration
../src/tgresql-16-685bc9fc97.clean/src/include/meson.build:12
Hi
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:27 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 14.01.24 12:37, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > What I try to do is packaging an app with androiddeployqt which fails
> > with an error:
> >
> > The bundled library lib/libpq.so.5 doesn't end with .so. Android only
> > supports versionless
On 14.01.24 12:37, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
What I try to do is packaging an app with androiddeployqt which fails
with an error:
The bundled library lib/libpq.so.5 doesn't end with .so. Android only
supports versionless libraries ending with the .so suffix.
This error was introduced in response
What I try to do is packaging an app with androiddeployqt which fails with
an error:
The bundled library lib/libpq.so.5 doesn't end with .so. Android only
supports versionless libraries ending with the .so suffix.
This error was introduced in response to this issue which contains hints
about the
Hi,
On 2024-01-05 15:57:23 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 05.01.24 01:00, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > Attached a patch with a (hopefully) better wording of the comment.
> >
> > I have unsuccessfully tried to find an official source for this policy.
> > So for reference some discussions about th
Hi,
On 2024-01-05 16:00:01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 01.01.24 06:25, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > It looks like meson does not currently support building for android, the
> > following output is what I get (but I have actually no experience with
> > meson):
> >
> > meson.build:320:2: E
On 01.01.24 06:25, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
It looks like meson does not currently support building for android, the
following output is what I get (but I have actually no experience with
meson):
meson.build:320:2: ERROR: Problem encountered: unknown host system:
android
FWIW, the meson so
On 05.01.24 01:00, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
Attached a patch with a (hopefully) better wording of the comment.
I have unsuccessfully tried to find an official source for this policy.
So for reference some discussions about the topic:
-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11491065/linking-with-vers
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 7:00 PM Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> Attached a patch with a (hopefully) better wording of the comment.
>
> I have unsuccessfully tried to find an official source for this policy.
> So for reference some discussions about the topic:
>
> -
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/114
Hi,
Attached a patch with a (hopefully) better wording of the comment.
I have unsuccessfully tried to find an official source for this policy.
So for reference some discussions about the topic:
-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11491065/linking-with-versioned-shared-library-in-android-ndk
-
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 1:24 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> FWIW, I have mixed feelings about patching the code to treat
> android-linux as an exception while changing nothing in the
> documentation to explain why this is required. A custom patch may
> serve you better here, and note that you did no
Thanks for all the comments and help.
I have added the patch to the January CF.
It looks like meson does not currently support building for android, the
following output is what I get (but I have actually no experience with
meson):
meson.build:320:2: ERROR: Problem encountered: unknown host
On 12/31/23 01:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 06:08:04AM +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
I was wondering if there are a) any comments on the approach and if I
should be handed in for a commitfest (currently waiting for the cooldown
period after account activation, I am not sure h
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 06:08:04AM +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> In order to ship libpq on Android, it needs to be built without a version
> suffix on the .so file.
> The attached patch will make sure that no version is added when built for
> Android.
FWIW, I have mixed feelings about patching the
Matthias Kuhn writes:
> In order to ship libpq on Android, it needs to be built without a version
> suffix on the .so file.
> The attached patch will make sure that no version is added when built for
> Android.
This ... seems incredibly brain-dead. Does Android really not cope
with version-to-ve
Hi,
In order to ship libpq on Android, it needs to be built without a version
suffix on the .so file.
The attached patch will make sure that no version is added when built for
Android.
I was wondering if there are a) any comments on the approach and if I
should be handed in for a commitfest (curre
18 matches
Mail list logo
