Tristan Partin:
On Fri Aug 9, 2024 at 11:14 AM CDT, Andres Freund wrote:
commit 4d8de281b5834c8f5e0be6ae21e884e69dffd4ce
Author: Heikki Linnakangas
Date: 2024-07-27 13:53:11 +0300
Fallback to clang in PATH with meson
[..]
I think this is a bad change unfortunately - this way clang and l
Tristan Partin:
On Fri Aug 9, 2024 at 11:14 AM CDT, Andres Freund wrote:
[..]
commit a00fae9d43e5adabc56e64a4df6d332062666501
Author: Heikki Linnakangas
Date: 2024-07-27 13:53:08 +0300
Fallback to uuid for ossp-uuid with meson
[..]
I think this is a redundant change with
commit 2416fdb
On Fri Aug 9, 2024 at 11:14 AM CDT, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
commit 4d8de281b5834c8f5e0be6ae21e884e69dffd4ce
Author: Heikki Linnakangas
Date: 2024-07-27 13:53:11 +0300
Fallback to clang in PATH with meson
Some distributions put clang into a different path than the llvm
binary p
Hi,
commit 4d8de281b5834c8f5e0be6ae21e884e69dffd4ce
Author: Heikki Linnakangas
Date: 2024-07-27 13:53:11 +0300
Fallback to clang in PATH with meson
Some distributions put clang into a different path than the llvm
binary path.
For example, this is the case on NixOS / nixpkgs,
On 26/07/2024 23:01, Tristan Partin wrote:
Heikki asked me to take a look at this patchset for the commitfest.
Looks good to me.
Heikki, just be careful rebasing the first patch. You need to make sure
the newly set `required: false` gets carried forward.
Committed and backpatched to v16 and v1
Heikki asked me to take a look at this patchset for the commitfest.
Looks good to me.
Heikki, just be careful rebasing the first patch. You need to make sure
the newly set `required: false` gets carried forward.
--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)
Peter Eisentraut:
On 29.03.24 19:47, walt...@technowledgy.de wrote:
> - uuid = dependency('ossp-uuid', required: true)
> + # upstream is called "uuid", but many distros change this to
"ossp-uuid"
> + uuid = dependency('ossp-uuid', 'uuid', required: true)
How would this behave if yo
On 29.03.24 19:47, walt...@technowledgy.de wrote:
> -uuid = dependency('ossp-uuid', required: true)
> +# upstream is called "uuid", but many distros change this to
"ossp-uuid"
> +uuid = dependency('ossp-uuid', 'uuid', required: true)
How would this behave if you have only uuid.pc fr
Hi,
>From your prior reply:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 23:44, Wolfgang Walther wrote:
>
> Nazir Bilal Yavuz:
> > 0001 & 0002: Adding code comments to explain why they have fallback
> > could be nice.
> > 0003: Looks good to me.
>
> Added some comments in the attached.
Comments look good, thanks.
O
Wolfgang Walther:
To build on NixOS/nixpkgs I came up with a few small patches to
meson.build. All of this works fine with Autoconf/Make already.
In v3, I added another small patch for meson, this one about proper
handling of -Dlibedit_preferred when used together with -Dreadline=enabled.
Be
Nazir Bilal Yavuz:
0001 & 0002: Adding code comments to explain why they have fallback
could be nice.
0003: Looks good to me.
Added some comments in the attached.
Best,
WolfgangFrom 2d271aafd96a0ea21710a06ac5236e47217c36d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wolfgang Walther
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024
On 2024-Mar-16, Wolfgang Walther wrote:
> The upstream name for the ossp-uuid package / pkg-config file is "uuid". Many
> distributions change this to be "ossp-uuid" to not conflict with e2fsprogs.
I can confirm that this is true for Debian, at least; the packaging
rules have this in override_dh_
Hi,
Thank you for the patches!
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 14:48, Wolfgang Walther wrote:
>
> To build on NixOS/nixpkgs I came up with a few small patches to
> meson.build. All of this works fine with Autoconf/Make already.
I do not have NixOS but I confirm that patches cleanly apply to master
and d
To build on NixOS/nixpkgs I came up with a few small patches to
meson.build. All of this works fine with Autoconf/Make already.From 24ae72b9b0adc578c6729eff59c9038e6b4ac517 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wolfgang Walther
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 17:18:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Fallback to uuid f
14 matches
Mail list logo
