Hi,
> > Aleksander, I would greatly appreciate if you join me in managing CF.
> > Together we can move more stuff :)
> > Currently, I'm going through "SQL Commands". And so far I had not come to
> > "Performance" and "Server Features" at all... So if you can handle updating
> > statuses of
Hi,
> > Aleksander, I would greatly appreciate if you join me in managing CF.
> > Together we can move more stuff :)
> > Currently, I'm going through "SQL Commands". And so far I had not come to
> > "Performance" and "Server Features" at all... So if you can handle updating
> > statuses of
Hi,
> > On 6 Mar 2024, at 18:49, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> >
> > Here are statuses for "Refactoring" section:
>
> [...]
> Aleksander, I would greatly appreciate if you join me in managing CF.
> Together we can move more stuff :)
> Currently, I'm going through "SQL Commands". And so far I had
> On 6 Mar 2024, at 18:49, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
> Here are statuses for "Refactoring" section:
I've made a pass through "Replication and Recovery" and "SQL commands" sections.
"SQL commands" section seems to me most interesting stuff on the commitfest
(but I'm far from inspecting
> On 4 Mar 2024, at 14:51, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
> I’ve read other small sections.
Here are statuses for "Refactoring" section:
* New [relation] options engine
Relatively heavy refactoring. Author keeps interest to the patch for
some years now. As I understood the main problem
> On 4 Mar 2024, at 13:42, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
> Here’s my take on “Miscellaneous” section.
I’ve read other small sections.
Monitoring & Control
* Logging parallel worker draught
The patchset on improving loggin os resource starvation when parallel
workers are spawned. Some
> On 3 Mar 2024, at 01:19, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>
> I'm not
> sure if the ones that do have a target version = 17 are actually all
> the patches targeting 17.
Yes, for me it’s only a hint where to bump things up. I will extend scope on
other versions when I fill finish a pass though
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 1:32 PM Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
> Hi hackers!
>
> In this thread, I want to promote entries from CommitFest that require
> review. I have scanned through the bugs, clients, and documentation sections,
> and here is my take on the current situation. All of these threads
Hi hackers!
In this thread, I want to promote entries from CommitFest that require review.
I have scanned through the bugs, clients, and documentation sections, and here
is my take on the current situation. All of these threads are currently in the
"Needs review" state and were marked by the
