> On 5 Apr 2024, at 02:08, Kirill Reshke wrote:
>
> maybe we need some hooks here? Or maybe, we can take CSN here from extension
> somehow.
I really like the idea of CSN-provider-as-extension.
But it's very important to move on with CSN, at least on standby, to make CSN
actually happen
replace the known-assigned-xids
> machinery with CSN snapshots. We've talked about CSN snapshots many
> times in the past, and I think it would make sense on the primary too,
> but for starters, we could use it just during Hot Standby.
>
> With CSN-based snapshots, you don't have
