Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-10 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
>Looks the same as v5 for me, that applies the same consistency rules >everywhere in the docs.  So applied this one. Thank you, Michael

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-10 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 05:58:05PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > Not sure why the previous emails didn't go through, and still doesn't > look like they were picked up. In the interest of progress though, > attaching an updated patch with some minor wordsmithing; lmk if you'd > prefer this differentl

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-10 Thread Robert Treat
check.sgml, config.sgml, > >protocol.sgml, and mvcc.sgml accordingly. > > Regards > Daniel > > > From: Daniel Westermann (DWE) > Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 15:15 > To: Michael Paquier > Cc: Robert Treat ; Kyotaro Horiguchi > ; aleksan...@timescale.com > ; pgsql-h

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-10 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
t;documentation and then continue with the other >>places. >Attached a new version which also modifies amcheck.sgml, config.sgml, >protocol.sgml, and mvcc.sgml accordingly. Regards Daniel From: Daniel Westermann (DWE) Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 15:15 To: Michael Paquier Cc

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-09 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
>>Hmm.  Outside the title that had better use upper-case characters for >>the first letter of each word, I can see references to the pattern you >>are trying to eliminate in amcheck.sgml (1), config.sgml (3), >>protocol.sgml (3) and mvcc.sgml (1).  Shouldn't you refresh these as >>well if the point

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-09 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Hi Michael, >On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 07:45:32AM +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: >> Thanks for having a look. Done that way. >Hmm.  Outside the title that had better use upper-case characters for >the first letter of each word, I can see references to the pattern you >are trying to eliminate

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-09 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 07:45:32AM +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: > Thanks for having a look. Done that way. Hmm. Outside the title that had better use upper-case characters for the first letter of each word, I can see references to the pattern you are trying to eliminate in amcheck.sgml (

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-08 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
>I think one more small change... >    A standby server can also be used for read-only queries, in which case >-   it is called a Hot Standby server. See for >+   it is called a hot standby server. See for >    more information. >    A standby server can also be used for read-only queries, in w

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-08 Thread Robert Treat
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:06 AM Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: > > >>> Thanks for having a look. Are you suggesting to change it like this? > >>> -Hot Standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to > >>> +Hot standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to >

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-07 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
>>> Thanks for having a look. Are you suggesting to change it like this? >>> -Hot Standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to >>> +Hot standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to >>Yes. Isn't it the right form of a sentence? I've created and entry in

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-02 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
>> Thanks for having a look. Are you suggesting to change it like this? >> -    Hot Standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to >> +    Hot standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to >Yes.  Isn't it the right form of a sentence? Done like that. Regards Dani

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-02 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
At Thu, 3 Mar 2022 06:55:43 +, "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" wrote in > Hi Kyotaro, > > >>    > >>-    Hot Standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to > >>+    hot standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to > > >They look like decapitalizing the first wo

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-02 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Hi Kyotaro, >>    >>-    Hot Standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to >>+    hot standby is the term used to describe the ability to connect to >They look like decapitalizing the first word in a sentsnce. Thanks for having a look. Are you suggesting to change it like this?

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-02 Thread Kyotaro Horiguchi
At Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:22:44 +, "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" wrote in > > Pretty sure that for titles we should keep English capitalization rules. > > Done like that. Thanks for taking a look. -Hot Standby feedback propagates upstream, whatever the cascaded arrangement. +hot stan

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-02 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Hi Aleksander, > Pretty sure that for titles we should keep English capitalization rules. Done like that. Thanks for taking a look. Regards Danieldiff --git a/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml index b5b6042104..08eb1ad946 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/high-ava

Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-02 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi Daniel, > Here is a patch that changes "Hot Standby" to "hot standby" in high-availability.sgml, so we have a consistent wording. > Thoughts? ``` - Hot Standby Parameter Reference + hot standby Parameter Reference ``` Pretty sure that for titles we should keep English capitalization rules

Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

2022-03-02 Thread Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Hi, with reference to the discussion in docs: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2221339.1645896597%40sss.pgh.pa.us#5a346c15ec2edbe8fcc93a1ffc2a7c7d Here is a patch that changes "Hot Standby" to "hot standby" in high-availability.sgml, so we have a consistent wording. Thoughts? There a