(Hmm. My sight must be as short as 2 word length..)
At Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:59:00 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> In the first place the "seg" is "fileno". Honestly I don't think the
> test doesn't reach to fileno boundary but I did in the attached. Since
Of course it is a mistake of
At Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:50:52 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
> Pushed the v5-0001-Tidy-up-XLogSource-usage.patch!
Thanks!
> Regarding the remaining patch adding the regression test,
I didn't seriously inteneded it to be in the tree.
> +$result =
> + $node_standby->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT
>
On 2020/03/09 15:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/03/09 13:49, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Sat, 7 Mar 2020 01:46:16 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
(It seems retroverting to the first patch when I started this...)
The second place covers wider cases so I reverted the first place.
Thanks for
At Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:46:49 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
> On 2020/03/09 13:49, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Sat, 7 Mar 2020 01:46:16 +0900, Fujii Masao
> >> Regarding 0003 patch, I added a bit more detail comments into
> >> the patch so that we can understand the code more easily.
> >> Update
On 2020/03/09 13:49, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Sat, 7 Mar 2020 01:46:16 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
(It seems retroverting to the first patch when I started this...)
The second place covers wider cases so I reverted the first place.
Thanks for updating the patch that way.
Not sure which
At Sat, 7 Mar 2020 01:46:16 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
> > (It seems retroverting to the first patch when I started this...)
> > The second place covers wider cases so I reverted the first place.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch that way.
> Not sure which patch you're mentioning, though.
Tha
On 2020/03/06 10:29, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:51:11 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2020/03/05 12:08, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
I understand that the reconnection for REDO record is useless. Ok I
take the !StandbyMode way.
The attached is the test script that is change
At Thu, 5 Mar 2020 19:51:11 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
>
>
> On 2020/03/05 12:08, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > I understand that the reconnection for REDO record is useless. Ok I
> > take the !StandbyMode way.
> > The attached is the test script that is changed to count the added
> > test, an
On 2020/03/05 12:08, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Mon, 2 Mar 2020 20:54:04 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
And random access during StandbyMode ususally (always?) lets RecPtr go
back. I'm not sure WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable works correctly if we
don't have a file in pg_wal and the REDO point i
At Mon, 2 Mar 2020 20:54:04 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
> > And random access during StandbyMode ususally (always?) lets RecPtr go
> > back. I'm not sure WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable works correctly if we
> > don't have a file in pg_wal and the REDO point is far back by more
> > than a segment f
On 2020/02/28 12:13, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:04:41 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2020/02/27 17:05, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Thank you for the comment.
At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:23:44 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2020/02/27 15:23, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
I fail
At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:04:41 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
>
>
> On 2020/02/27 17:05, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Thank you for the comment.
> > At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:23:44 +0900, Fujii Masao
> > wrote in
> >> On 2020/02/27 15:23, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I failed to understand why ran
On 2020/02/27 17:05, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Thank you for the comment.
At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:23:44 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2020/02/27 15:23, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
I failed to understand why random access while reading from
stream is bad idea. Could you elaborate why?
It seems
Thank you for the comment.
At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:23:44 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
> On 2020/02/27 15:23, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> >> I failed to understand why random access while reading from
> >> stream is bad idea. Could you elaborate why?
> > It seems to me the word "streaming" suggests
On 2020/02/27 15:23, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:40:55 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2020/02/27 12:48, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Hello.
We found that targetted promotion can cause an assertion failure. The
attached TAP test causes that.
TRAP: FailedAssertion("Stand
At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:40:55 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
>
>
> On 2020/02/27 12:48, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Hello.
> > We found that targetted promotion can cause an assertion failure. The
> > attached TAP test causes that.
> >
> >> TRAP: FailedAssertion("StandbyMode", File: "xlog.c", L
On 2020/02/27 12:48, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Hello.
We found that targetted promotion can cause an assertion failure. The
attached TAP test causes that.
TRAP: FailedAssertion("StandbyMode", File: "xlog.c", Line: 12078)
After recovery target is reached, StartupXLOG turns off standby mode
Hello.
We found that targetted promotion can cause an assertion failure. The
attached TAP test causes that.
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("StandbyMode", File: "xlog.c", Line: 12078)
After recovery target is reached, StartupXLOG turns off standby mode
then refetches the last record. If the last record
18 matches
Mail list logo
