On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:02 PM wrote:
>
> >
> > The next line related to asynchronous replication is also not required. See
> > attached.
>
> Thanks, I found another ".. without losing data".
>
I'll push this tomorrow unless there are any other suggestions on this patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit
> > > > > So, will it be okay if we just remove ".. without losing data"
> > > > > from the sentence? Will that avoid the confusion you have?
> > > > Yes. Additionally, it would be better to add notes about data
> > > > consistency after failover for example
> > > >
> > > > Note that data consisten
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 6:16 AM wrote:
>
> > > > So, will it be okay if we just remove ".. without losing data" from
> > > > the sentence? Will that avoid the confusion you have?
> > > Yes. Additionally, it would be better to add notes about data
> > > consistency after failover for example
> > >
> > > So, will it be okay if we just remove ".. without losing data" from
> > > the sentence? Will that avoid the confusion you have?
> > Yes. Additionally, it would be better to add notes about data
> > consistency after failover for example
> >
> > Note that data consistency after failover can va
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:05 PM wrote:
>
> > So, will it be okay if we just remove ".. without losing data" from the
> > sentence? Will that
> > avoid the confusion you have?
> Yes. Additionally, it would be better to add notes about data consistency
> after failover for example
>
> Note that da
> So, will it be okay if we just remove ".. without losing data" from the
> sentence? Will that
> avoid the confusion you have?
Yes. Additionally, it would be better to add notes about data consistency after
failover for example
Note that data consistency after failover can vary depending on the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:18 AM wrote:
>
> > I think you see such a behavior because you have disabled
> > 'synchronized_standby_slots'
> > in your script (# disable "synchronized_standby_slots"). You need to enable
> > that to
> > avoid data loss. Considering that, I don't think your proposed
Thans for your responses.
> I think you see such a behavior because you have disabled
> 'synchronized_standby_slots'
> in your script (# disable "synchronized_standby_slots"). You need to enable
> that to
> avoid data loss. Considering that, I don't think your proposed text is an
> improvement.
On Monday, August 26, 2024, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 6:38 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, August 26, 2024 5:37 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:30 PM wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When I read the following documentation related to t
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 6:38 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> On Monday, August 26, 2024 5:37 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:30 PM wrote:
> > >
> > > When I read the following documentation related to the
> > "synchronized_standby_slots", I misunderstood that data l
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:30 PM wrote:
>
> When I read the following documentation related to the
> "synchronized_standby_slots", I misunderstood that data loss would not occur
> in the case of synchronous physical replication. However, this is incorrect
> (see reproduce.txt).
>
I think you se
On Monday, August 26, 2024 5:37 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:30 PM wrote:
> >
> > When I read the following documentation related to the
> "synchronized_standby_slots", I misunderstood that data loss would not occur
> in the case of synchronous physical replication. Howeve
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:30 PM wrote:
>
> When I read the following documentation related to the
> "synchronized_standby_slots", I misunderstood that data loss would not occur
> in the case of synchronous physical replication. However, this is incorrect
> (see reproduce.txt).
>
> > Note that i
Hi,
When I read the following documentation related to the
"synchronized_standby_slots", I misunderstood that data loss would not occur in
the case of synchronous physical replication. However, this is incorrect (see
reproduce.txt).
> Note that in the case of asynchronous replication, there re
14 matches
Mail list logo
