On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 02:58:43PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I don't think that's an improvement. With this patch if you see the
> "paral_planned_not_exec" counter going up, you still don't know if this is
> because of the !es_use_parallel_mode or if you simply have too many parallel
>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 08:36:44AM -0500, Daymel Bonne Solís wrote:
>
> We have rewritten the patch and added the necessary columns to have the
> number of times a parallel query plan was not executed using parallelism.
>
> We are investigating how to add more information related to the
Hi:
We have rewritten the patch and added the necessary columns to have the
> number of times a parallel query plan was not executed using parallelism.
>
>
This version includes comments on the source code and documentation.
Regards
v3-0001-Add-parallel-counters-to-pg_stat_statements.patch
Hi,
El lun, 25 jul 2022 a la(s) 14:19, Anthony Sotolongo (asotolo...@gmail.com)
escribió:
> On 23-07-22 00:03, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:11:35PM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
> >> On 22-07-22 12:08, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >>> With your current patch it
On 23-07-22 00:03, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:11:35PM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
On 22-07-22 12:08, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
With your current patch it only says if the plan and execution had parallelism
enabled, but not if it could actually use with parallelism at
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:11:35PM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
>
> On 22-07-22 12:08, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> >
> > With your current patch it only says if the plan and execution had
> > parallelism
> > enabled, but not if it could actually use with parallelism at all. It gives
> > some
On 22-07-22 12:08, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:17:52AM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
On 21-07-22 20:35, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 06:26:58PM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
Hi all:
Here's a patch to add counters about planned/executed for
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:17:52AM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
>
> On 21-07-22 20:35, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 06:26:58PM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
> > > Hi all:
> > > Here's a patch to add counters about planned/executed for parallelism
> > > to
> > >
On 21-07-22 20:35, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 06:26:58PM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
Hi all:
Here's a patch to add counters about planned/executed for parallelism to
pg_stat_statements, as a way to follow-up on if the queries are
planning/executing with parallelism,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 06:26:58PM -0400, Anthony Sotolongo wrote:
> Hi all:
> Here's a patch to add counters about planned/executed for parallelism to
> pg_stat_statements, as a way to follow-up on if the queries are
> planning/executing with parallelism, this can help to understand if you
Hi all:
Here's a patch to add counters about planned/executed for parallelism
to pg_stat_statements, as a way to follow-up on if the queries are
planning/executing with parallelism, this can help to understand if you
have a good/bad configuration or if your hardware is enough
We
11 matches
Mail list logo
